In reality, Miguel Rodriguez (or Miguel Antonio Rodriguez) was never an owner of Royal Decree 01-4 Protocol, contrary to the allegations of several camps who keep on using their ownership traceback from said Miguel Rodriguez. Miguel Rodriguez de Berriz was not owner but one of the youngest judges (juez) ever to be appointed. In this publication in the Gazeta de Manila, Miguel Rodriguez (de Berriz) appears in the document of "Titulo de Propriedad de Terrenos of 1891, Royal Decree 01-4 Protocol", the District of Tayabas (Distrito de Tayabas) being a portion of the estate under Royal Decree 01-4. In fact, in the Decision dated April 27, 1999, the Amended Decision dated August 13, 1999 both of the case Special Proceedings No. IR-1110, ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ Y REYES, and NOT MIGUEL, was found and declared as the brother of HERMOGENES RODRIGUEZ Y REYES. This fact was declared WITHOUT DISPUTE in the June 22, 2011 Supreme Court Decision in G.R. No.182645:Rene Pascual vs. Jaime Robles. It was also an admitted fact of evidence in the Court of Appeals Decision dated June 22, 1995 of CA-G.R. SP No.33806 that was upheld by the Supreme Court in the minute Resolution with Entry of Judgment of SC-G.R. No. L-120811 dated December 4, 1995 and January 15, 1996 respectively.
A Legal Brief of the Hermogenes Reyes Rodriguez Estate SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS No. IR-1110: DETERMINATION OF THE TRUE LEGAL HEIRS, APPOINTMENT OF THE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATOR and SETTLEMENT OF THE INTESTATE ESTATE OF THE DECEASED (This is the Official Blogsite of Judicial Administrator Henry F. Rodriguez)
Sunday, January 24, 2016
MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ, JUEZ DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA OF TAYABAS AND NOT OWNER/CO-OWNER OF ROYAL DECREE 01-4 PROTOCOL
In reality, Miguel Rodriguez (or Miguel Antonio Rodriguez) was never an owner of Royal Decree 01-4 Protocol, contrary to the allegations of several camps who keep on using their ownership traceback from said Miguel Rodriguez. Miguel Rodriguez de Berriz was not owner but one of the youngest judges (juez) ever to be appointed. In this publication in the Gazeta de Manila, Miguel Rodriguez (de Berriz) appears in the document of "Titulo de Propriedad de Terrenos of 1891, Royal Decree 01-4 Protocol", the District of Tayabas (Distrito de Tayabas) being a portion of the estate under Royal Decree 01-4. In fact, in the Decision dated April 27, 1999, the Amended Decision dated August 13, 1999 both of the case Special Proceedings No. IR-1110, ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ Y REYES, and NOT MIGUEL, was found and declared as the brother of HERMOGENES RODRIGUEZ Y REYES. This fact was declared WITHOUT DISPUTE in the June 22, 2011 Supreme Court Decision in G.R. No.182645:Rene Pascual vs. Jaime Robles. It was also an admitted fact of evidence in the Court of Appeals Decision dated June 22, 1995 of CA-G.R. SP No.33806 that was upheld by the Supreme Court in the minute Resolution with Entry of Judgment of SC-G.R. No. L-120811 dated December 4, 1995 and January 15, 1996 respectively.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GENERAL MEMORANDUM FROM THE JUDICIALLY APPOINTED ESTATE ADMINISTRATOR, HENRY F. RODRIGUEZ THROUGH COURT NOTED ATTY-IN-FACT, RENATO B. GOMEZ...
-
As I have discussed this again and again, there was no such thing as OCT #01-4. What was accepted by the then President Ferdinand E....
-
THE INFAMOUS DECEPTION AND FAKERY ON December 11, 2009, the Court of Appeals, acting on two cases pending before them, one of w...
-
In behalf of Mr. Henry F. Rodriguez, the Supreme Court NOTES the authority given to Mr. Renato B. Gomez as his duly recognized Attorney-in-f...
No comments:
Post a Comment