A SHORT REVIEW OF PASAY RTC BRANCH 111 CASE:LRC CIVIL CASE No. 3957-P and Relative Decisions concerning the Tallanos, Acopiados, and Acops..

THE INFAMOUS DECEPTION AND FAKERY

      ON December 11, 2009, the Court of Appeals, acting on two cases pending before them, one of which was filed by the OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL, came out with the DECISION, the dispositive portion of the aforesaid CA Decision which states:

xxx

            "WHEREFORE, premises considered, We render judgment as follows:

      As to CA-G.R. SP No. 70014:

(1) The reconstitution proceedings in LRC/ Civil Case No. 3957-P in respondent Court are DECLARED VOID for lack of jurisdiction.

(2) The following decisions/ orders/ writ/ and other documents are ANNULLED and DECLARED VOID and of no force and effect:

a. Decision With Compromise Agreement dated February 4, 1972233 consisting of 139 pages;

b. Clarificatory Order dated March 21, 1974 consisting of 30 pages;

c. Decision dated November 4, 1975235 consisting of 44 pages;

d. Clarificatory Decision dated January 19, 1976 consisting of 60 pages;

e. Entry of Judgment dated June 14, 1972 consisting of 7/ 6 pages;

f. Writ of Execution, Demolition and Possession dated September 10, 1974238 consisting of 14 pages;

g. Certificate of Sheriff’s Return dated November 17, 1974;

h. Letters of Administration dated July 7, 1976;

i. Certified True Photocopy of Judicial Form No. 140, G.L.R.O. Form No. 68, Book No. 34 of TCT No. T-408 consisting of 7 pages;

j. Certified True Photocopy of TCT No. T-498242 consisting of 7 pages;

k. Order of Third Alias Writ of Execution, Possession and Demolition dated May 28, 1989243 consisting of 55 pages;

l. Order dated July 7, 1997;

m.Order dated July 11, 2001; and

n. Order dated October 8, 2001.

(3) TCT No. T-408 and TCT No. T-498, which were reconstituted pursuant to the Order dated July 11,

2001, are DECLARED VOID. Accordingly, the Registers of Deeds of the Provinces of Rizal and Bulacan (in Guiguinto, Bulacan) are DIRECTED to CANCEL TCT No. T-408 and TCT No. T-498.

(4) The writ of preliminary injunction issued by this Court on June 25, 2002 is made PERMANENT.

(5) The heirs, agents, privies, or anyone acting for and in behalf of JM Tallano, AM Acopiado and AM Acop are ENJOINED from representing or exercising any acts of possession/ ownership or from disposing in any manner, portions of the land covered by alleged TCT No. 408, TCT No. T-408, and TCT No. T- 498.

      As to CA-G.R. SP No. 104604:

(6) Respondents Manila International Airport Authority, Land Transportation Office and Pasay City Government are declared NOT GUILTY of indirect contempt. Consequently, the petition for indirect contempt against them is DISMISSED for lack of merit.

      SO ORDERED.

                                                                     MAGDANGAL M. DE LEON

                                                                                   Associate Justice

WE CONCUR:

HAKIM S. ABDULWAHID    ESTELA M. PERLAS-BERNABE

              Associate Justice                                                  Associate Justice 

xxx

THE TRUE FACTS ON THE CASE:

1) The case at Pasay RTC Branch 111 was never about the Tallanos, Acopiados or Acops.  It was a Reconveyance and Reconstitution Petition filed by a certain WILSON ORFINADA against MACARIO  RODRIGUEZ.  The Petition, filed sometime in 1973, alleges that WILSON ORFINADA was able to secure a Deed of Absolute Sale from Macario Rodriguez for all the properties that the Rodriguezes owned, especially in the Province of Rizal and Manila.  Sometime in 1974, Mr. HENRY F. RODRIGUEZ, grandson of the late Macario Rodriguez, filed a criminal case against Wilson Orfinada for falsifying public documents and forging the signature of his grandfather Macario Rodriguez on the fake deed of sale.  For this, Mr. Wilson Orfinada went into hiding abroad and was not able to pursue the above mentioned Reconstitution case.  In fact, the case files, along with the other files from the Hall of Justice in Pasay City was burned by an extensive fire that wiped out the entire Court documents in the Offices of the Hall of Justice of Pasay City.  NONE OF THE TALLANOS, ACOPIADOS OR ACOPS were ever able to file any intervention on the above titled case, and that the entire Pasay RTC records that were alleged to have been reconstituted by the Pasay City RTC Court were all falsely manufactured by the alleged intervenors, they being the culprit themselves.  In fact, the Acopiados who used to show a fake deed of sale from Don Hermogenes Rodriguez to the alleged Don Anacleto Figueroa Acopiado is also a fake considering that the alleged Deed of Sale (or any deed of sale from Don Hermogenes Rodriguez for that matter) were signed sometime in 1913 and was notarized ten years later, in 1923, considering Don Hermogenes Rodriguez y Reyes died intestate in the year 1910 (see rollo 68, page 3 Decision April 27, 1999, Special Proceedings No. IR-1110).  To further expound on this, the Acopiados were never related to the Madrigals, for in truth the "M" in their middle name stands for MONTANEZ and NOT MADRIGAL!  We would like to cite to you the findings of the Supreme Court concerning the Roberto Acopiado claim, the Resolution of the Supreme Court discussing the Petition in intervention filed by the Acopiados:

(READ FOR YOURSELVES FROM A CERTIFIED FAITHFULLY REPRODUCED PHOTOCOPY OF THE SUPREME COURT RESOLUTION GR No.162704 DATED APRIL 6, 2005, THE SUPREME COURT'S DENIAL OF ROBERTO ACOPIADO'S INTERVENTION AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND NATIONAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION BEING CALLED TO TASK BY THE HIGHEST COURT OF THE LAND TO STUDY THE FAKE COURT DOCUMENTS & TITLE  FOR FILING OF CRIMINAL CASES AGAINST THE INTERVENOR ROBERTO P. ACOPIADO AND HIS REPRESENTATIVES)

   

         

               

         Now, is this very obvious?  We do not need to comment or act anymore, for the Supreme Court and the Judicial hierarchy had already done what needed to be done, with all due respect to the Department of Justice and the National Bureau of Investigation. While the true Hermogenes Rodriguez and Antonio Rodriguez y Reyes heirs did not speak a single word against the government for unfairly clustering the true Estate with the false ones, the Estate has already quietly proven through the Honorable Courts that plain truth is with the true estate.

(This writer's Note:  For a more extensive reading of the decision and outcome of the case with the official website of the Courts, please check the Court of Appeals website and type http://ca.judiciary.gov.ph/cardis/SP70014.pdf...rbg54)