In April 14, 2008, I wrote a letter to the National Library and Archives Records Management Office to inquire about the records on Miguel Rodriguez if he was owner/co-owner of Royal Decree 01-4 or not. The Filipiniana Division National Library responded by indicating that Miguel Rodriguez was not recorded as owner of Royal Decree 01-4 but was a "Juez de Primera Instancia" of the District of Tayabas, now Quezon Province. Herewith is the letter response dated April 17, 2008 of Mr. Narciso J. Cruz, Filipiniana Division, together with the publication on the Gazeta de Manila attached to this net publication as evidence so that all the public would know:
In reality, Miguel Rodriguez (or Miguel Antonio Rodriguez) was never an owner of Royal Decree 01-4 Protocol, contrary to the allegations of several camps who keep on using their ownership traceback from said Miguel Rodriguez. Miguel Rodriguez de Berriz was not owner but one of the youngest judges (juez) ever to be appointed. In this publication in the Gazeta de Manila, Miguel Rodriguez (de Berriz) appears in the document of "Titulo de Propriedad de Terrenos of 1891, Royal Decree 01-4 Protocol", the District of Tayabas (Distrito de Tayabas) being a portion of the estate under Royal Decree 01-4. In fact, in the Decision dated April 27, 1999, the Amended Decision dated August 13, 1999 both of the case Special Proceedings No. IR-1110, ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ Y REYES, and NOT MIGUEL, was found and declared as the brother of HERMOGENES RODRIGUEZ Y REYES. This fact was declared WITHOUT DISPUTE in the June 22, 2011 Supreme Court Decision in G.R. No.182645:Rene Pascual vs. Jaime Robles. It was also an admitted fact of evidence in the Court of Appeals Decision dated June 22, 1995 of CA-G.R. SP No.33806 that was upheld by the Supreme Court in the minute Resolution with Entry of Judgment of SC-G.R. No. L-120811 dated December 4, 1995 and January 15, 1996 respectively.
.tif)
